• DOUBLETAKE 08: “Taking a second look at race and racism in the 2008 presidential elections”

  • Campaign Events

    Sat, October 25th, 3-6:30pm
    The Ballot Box and Beyond
    UCLA Labor Center
    675 S Park View St [map it]
    Los Angeles, CA 90057
  • Advertisements

The “Obama as Muslim Terrorist” Problem

There’s been a LOT of anti-Muslim and anti-Arab rhetoric throughout the election season this year. The idea that Barack Obama is a “Muslim Terrorist” is spreading rampant throughout right-wing circles, and countless photoshopped images of Obama in Arab garb can be found in a quick google image search. The implication in these images, of course, is that being a Muslim or being Arab MUST mean he is also a terrorist. Even if Barack Obama WAS Muslim, which he is not, what’s the problem? But anti-Muslim/ anti-Arab racism is so deeply held in this country, that using the term “Muslim” has come to be code word for “evil.” Check this image…

Senator John McCain’s campaign has done little to offset these stereotypes. In fact, in some instances, the Republican campaign reinforces or encourages this racist thinking. For example, Governor Sarah Palin last week suggesting that Obama has been “palling around with terrorists,” referring to a long-ago and vague connection between the Senator and former 60’s radical William Ayers

Or in this clip here, where a woman at a McCain rally says “I don’t trust Obama. He’s an Arab,” and John McCain responds: “No, ma’am, he’s a decent family man and citizen.” As if being an Arab and a decent family man and citizen are somehow mutually exclusive! The rage at McCain rallies in the last week often centers on this assumption that Obama is connected to terrorism and that he is a Muslim.

Don’t fall for these racist tactics and rhetoric. We at AWARE_LA encourage everyone to reject the hate in 08. No matter who you vote for, we must stop this racist rhetoric and thinking.

Fortunetaly, others are working on this issue. A non-partisan organization called FAIR (Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting) has launched an important campaign to look at anti-Muslim rhetoric in the news media.

Continue reading


DoubleSpeak Dictionary #5

Hillary Clinton: “Now, like some of you may have been, I was taken aback by the demeaning remarks Sen. Obama made about people in small town America. Sen. Obama’s remarks are elitist and they are out of touch. They are not reflective of the values and beliefs of Americans. Certainly not the Americans that I know – not the Americans I grew up with, not the Americans I lived with in Arkansas or represent in New York.” (April, 2008)


Some possible decodings…. by Organizer JP

Used with racist implications to criticize an African American person who dares transgress what the speaker sees as the place of black people in society by running for high office. This use of “elitist” suggests that African Americans 1) should not contradict the racist stereotypes of unemployed males and welfare moms or 2) they can be model middle-class citizens but should never dare attempt to enter the elite ranks of power in U.S. society. Both the Democrats (in the Hillary Clinton campaign) and Republicans have attacked Obama as “an elitist.” What’s factually misleading about attacking Obama as “an elitist” is that he was raised without class privileges and has gone on to modest economic success and to become a social and political leader, thereby fulfilling the American Dream.

Does Race Matter in ’08? The View from NPR

News Analysis by Organizer CF

NPR’s Michelle Norris and Steve Inskeep have teamed up to offer listeners an in-depth listen into a conversation among 13 diverse voters from York, Pennsylvania.

Norris explains why she was personally motivated to produce the piece, admitting that race is often mentioned in election coverage but rarely given the necessary time and space to draw out complex and diverse experiences and subconscious feelings.

Upon first reaction- and having worked for NPR- I know that this more nuanced approach to race and politics is under appreciated and under covered in the network.

Continue reading

DoubleSpeak Dictionary Entry #1

“The Race Card”

Commentary by Organizer KL

This phrase is often used to point a critical finger at people of color
whom draw attention or criticism to racism and discrimination. Example here. But what’s underneath the use of this phrase? When used by white people toward people of color, accusations of “pulling the race card” imply that naming racism as a reality and a problem is illegitimate and a manipulative political

In early August, Barack Obama was accused of “pulling the race card” by
the McCain camp. Mr. McCain’s campaign manager, Rick Davis stated that
“Barack Obama has played the race card, and he played it from the bottom
of the deck. It’s divisive, negative, shameful and wrong.”
Continue reading

The Racist Rhetoric of “Terrorism”

“I think it’s very clear who Hamas wants to be the next president of the United States. I think that people should understand that I will be Hamas’s worst nightmare … If Senator Obama is favored by Hamas I think people can make judgments accordingly.” (John McCain April 2008)

News Analysis From Organizer KD

In April John McCain spoke these words in response to Ahmed Yousef, a political advisor for Palestinian political party Hamas, who stated in an interview with WABC radio in New York that, “We like Mr. Obama” and “we hope that he will win the election.”  What is McCain suggesting in this statement?  Is he suggesting that it is better to be their mortal enemy than to consider any dialogue that could have potential to reach a resolution?  Given that the US State Department lists Hamas as a terrorist organization is it possible that McCain is playing the “terrorist card”?  That is, if someone or some organization is deemed terrorist then they are by nature incapable of engaging in rationale discourse.  They are wild animals that must be tamed, not human beings to engage with.

Following this logic, we don’t even need to know who or what Hamas is to judge them accordingly.  If they’re terrorists, they must necessarily be cold blooded and evil.  Therefore if they support Obama then Obama is certainly guilty by association; association with terrorists that is.  But let’s be frank, terrorists are definitely not white; they’re most likely Arabs and perhaps they’re even black or Latino, but they certainly aren’t white.  Look at the Oklahoma City bombing- political pundits were so quick to speculate that it was the work of Arabs- yet it was a homegrown white man named Timothy McVeigh.

Our association of the word terrorist with Arabs is something that has been burned into our brains for decades.  From Hollywood to the nightly news we see images of angry Arabs holding guns, hijacking planes, on their knees praising Allah, wearing Muslim headdress.  But we don’t have any meaningful context for these images; so many Americans can’t make sense of them.  We’re left with statements from George W. Bush like “They hate us because we are free.” or “They hate our freedoms.”  And when we see the world through the lens of such statements is it any wonder there is a mistrust and fear of Arabs in our society?

But whose interest does this fear and mistrust serve?  Who is setting the boundaries of this conversation?  When we accept the slander of terrorist as legitimate discourse we lose any chance of building bridges with people.  We move out of racism and hatred rather than openness.  This, my friend, is the web we must unweave.